PROVINCETOWN — The select board’s proposal for a “walk only zone” on the densest part of Commercial Street between Memorial Day and Labor Day, which sparked vocal opposition and little support, is off the table.
The board voted unanimously on June 24 to indefinitely postpone a public hearing on the plan to restrict a wide range of vehicles, although not cars or trucks, on Commercial Street between Center Street, near the town library, and Masonic Place, close to the post office. The users of pedal and electric bikes, scooters, and “wheeled or electric devices of any kind” would have been required to dismount and walk their vehicles. The rule would not have applied to electric wheelchairs, according to the public hearing documents.
The proposal generated almost 100 pages of public comments, nearly all of them negative.
When it was time for the hearing to begin, board chair Dave Abramson moved to indefinitely postpone it. There were 50 people in the room — “more than for pickleball,” noted board member Leslie Sandberg — and Abramson’s move surprised the crowd.
Abramson said the measure was unnecessary because an education effort launched in May to publicize Commercial Street’s existing rules had been effective. Those rules allow pedal bicycles to travel both ways but prohibit electrified vehicles from going against the flow of car traffic.
At the board’s May 13 meeting, Town Manager Alex Morse had said he would work with the police dept. to make those regulations better known. The town’s summer community service officers, or CSOs, wearing neon-yellow shirts, are chiefly tasked with encouraging commuters and visitors to abide by traffic laws.
“They’re not there to overpolice, to hand out tickets,” Morse said on June 24. Their role is “to educate, to try to reduce the frequency of accidents, and just remind people to slow down and be courteous to folks around them.”
Sandberg, who had expressed support for the walk zone on May 13, said she had changed her mind after speaking with the CSOs.
“I concur that this proposal is not needed at this time,” she said, “and not because of the people who said they were going to sue us or come to our house with pitchforks. I went down to the street, I saw the CSOs talking to people, and I asked businesspeople who had said things were terrible before, and they said it’s going great.”
“I apologize to everyone who came out here pretty worked up, thinking that we were going to discuss it,” board member Erik Borg added. “I had a whole spiel myself ready to go.”
Written Comments
The packet for the June 24 hearing included 95 pages of emailed comments on the walk zone proposal, including 76 messages against it and 8 in support. Many of the opposing comments touted Provincetown’s bike-friendly reputation and disputed that the walk zone would improve safety overall, given the risks associated with travel on Bradford Street.
The Provincetown Bicycle Committee wrote a letter of opposition. “A ban on bicycles would likely trade minor, unreported injuries on Commercial Street with far more serious injuries on Bradford Street, where cars travel over four times faster and where crashes with cars and trucks are much more of a risk to life,” wrote Rik Ahlberg, Max Cliggott-Perlt, and Tracy Kachtick-Anders.
Thirty-three commenters, including supporters and opponents of the walk zone, suggested that the board should consider banning cars on Commercial Street.
Several commenters pointed out that “walk only zone” was a misnomer, since cars would still be allowed. “I would in fact support a decision that required everyone to walk in the zone,” wrote Colton Atkinson, “but prohibiting multimodal users and permitting motor vehicles is akin to having a no-weapon zone that bans knives but allows guns.”
Just before the board voted to postpone, Borg said it still wasn’t clear to him how the proposal began. “How the cross streets were selected, who was consulted — I guess it’s irrelevant now,” he said.
Board member Austin Miller, the other vocal opponent of the proposal when it was first introduced, said that “the most serious incident in the past week that involved an injury on Commercial Street” involved a car.
“I’m sorry you guys came out,” Sandberg said to the audience, “but because we put this proposal out we have enforcement from the police. For me that’s been a big problem, and now we have a public awareness campaign.”