TRURO — The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) announced the final sale notice for the Gulf of Maine offshore wind project lease areas on Sept. 16. The agency shrunk the overall area by 120,000 acres, removing significant portions of the two northern leases off the coast of Maine, carving a transit lane between the two farthest-offshore southern areas, and shaving small portions off other southern areas.
In an email to the Independent, BOEM spokeswoman Alison Ferris said her agency made the changes to avoid North Atlantic right whale areas, establish a barrier around Jeffrey’s Bank Habitat Management Area off Maine, and respond to feedback from at least three different fisheries working groups.
This decision did little to satisfy Jerry Leeman, a Harpswell, Maine-based former commercial fisherman and founder of the New England Fishermen’s Stewardship Association (NEFSA), an organization that opposes the Gulf of Maine offshore wind area.
NEFSA “remains steadfast in its opposition,” wrote Leeman in a press release, “despite the shrinking of the original areas.”
Four days earlier, on Sept. 12, Leeman gave a talk he called a “wind energy informational” at the Truro Public Library. Leeman drew on his own experience and described what he sees as BOEM’s lack of good baseline data for the offshore wind project.
“From a sea captain’s perspective, if you don’t know where you are, then surely you don’t know where you’re going,” Leeman told his audience.
BOEM’s work so far concerns only the impact of identifying possible areas for leasing. The final environmental assessment (EA) for each lease, which it will use to evaluate potential environmental impacts and suggest mitigation measures, will not be completed until leases are auctioned. A lease will not permit construction but will allow only the right to submit project plans.
BOEM solicited comments from the public on the draft EA in June and July and input from the Outer Cape community specifically in a forum held on July 17 in Eastham.
Elena Rice, who has operated Reel Deal Fishing Charters in Truro with her husband, Bobby, for 25 years, spoke at the Eastham forum, but she says BOEM didn’t hear her. “We went to that meeting,” Rice said. “We said our piece. It had no effect on the final EA.”
Truro Select Board clerk Nancy Medoff, who was at the BOEM forum, contacted Rice afterwards, because, Medoff said, she thought it was important to support fishermen who are concerned about the potential risks of wind energy projects.
Medoff wouldn’t say what she thinks about the proposed offshore wind project or about Leeman’s advocacy against it. She said she had heard Leeman speak at BOEM’s forum and was “interested in what he was saying.”
“I think BOEM needs to either address the questions that have been asked in a very clear, succinct, and easy to find manner or hold more forums on the Outer Cape,” said Medoff.
Truro marketing coordinator Katie Riconda also reached out to Rice after BOEM’s Eastham forum. Riconda told the Independent that Rice offered to help organize a local event, and it was Rice who invited Leeman to be the speaker for the session.
Riconda added that the event was not organized by the town of Truro or the Truro Select Board, and that neither has an official policy position on wind energy development.
Rice said that she is particularly concerned about the populations of striped bass and bluefin tuna that sustain her small business and her family. She included this in her comment to BOEM, which did not consider recreational bluefin tuna data in the draft EA.
Rice criticized BOEM at its forum for using data on highly migratory species like bluefin tuna without using latitude and longitude, and BOEM renewable energy program specialist Zachary Jylkka conceded this was “a known issue.”
“This is the sentiment in the fishing community: a complete distrust of the system and the fact that our voices are completely ignored,” Rice said.
“There’s a huge rift between the scientific community and the fishermen,” said another audience member. “They won’t listen to what we try to tell them.”
At his talk at the library, Leeman said many outstanding questions remain on the potential impact of the project on the fisheries.
For example, Leeman pointed out that vessel trip report data, which BOEM uses to determine the value of fishing areas, includes only an average depth for the trip and which broad “chart area” fishing was performed in, so the specifics of where fish are caught is not captured in mapping efforts.
In BOEM and NOAA’s siting analysis report, commercial fishing data are only part of the information used to determine suitability. The agency also uses large boat vessel monitoring system data, Northeast Fisheries Science Center trawl data, seafloor mapping of vulnerable habitat, data on right whales, and recommendations from the wind industry for deciding where to locate turbines.
Some of Leeman’s criticisms of wind projects took up issues scientists have also raised. For example, he described substations that heat seawater to keep themselves cool and trenchers to bury undersea cables as possible problems. “We know we’re changing the ocean, but to what extent, we have no idea,” he said. Many scientists agree there are still unknowns to be studied, especially when it comes to floating turbines.
Operational turbines, Leeman said during his talk, can interfere with ship radar, which could make navigating in inclement weather particularly dangerous. The National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine stressed similar findings in a 2022 report.
Some of Leeman’s points, however, contained inaccuracies.
He argued that electromagnetic fields from undersea cables would cause mutations in lobsters, but as reported previously by the Independent, this claim is based on a study using electromagnetic fields that were 10 to 100 times stronger than the kind found around turbine cables.
Leeman’s remarks on the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution experiment involving releasing sodium hydroxide into the Gulf of Maine are not supported by the institution’s preliminary results. While those show the experiment would not harm plankton populations, Leeman claimed it would kill so much wildlife as to render an environmental assessment invalid.
The U.S. Dept. of the Interior set an Oct. 29, 2024 auction date for the eight offshore wind energy leases in the Gulf of Maine.
Editor’s note: Because of a reporting error, an earlier version of this article, published in print on Sept. 19, incorrectly identified Brendan Adams as a fisherman who commented on the wind power controversy. Adams was not present at the Truro forum.